1995 Fools: ALERT!! LoofBot Launched
ALERT!! LoofBot Launched
In article <6ip2p1$dwf@hubris.sevr.yhbt.edu>,
Andrew Purella (a.purella@prime.yhbt.edu) wrote:
> Leech (leech@aol.com) wrote:
>:
>: I've been seeing: APPROVED BY LOOFBOT on the bottom of a
>: bunch of messages? What the <HECK> is this supposed to
>: mean? I don't ever recall noticing it until just a few
> [chomp]
>
>Hey people! Wake up and get the word out on this -- FAST! Grab a crayon
>and write your Senator while you're at it. (I hope you ninnies out there
>who voted republican are happy with yourselves!)
>
[...snip,snip,snip...]
> THE BALTIMORE CLARION-HERALD -- Friday, March 31st, 1995
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> (UPA) An ad hoc Senate subcommittee on electronic communications
>has approved a plan to clean up profanity on the Information Superhighway.
>Spurred in part by debate on an ammendment to the General Telcom Reform
>Bill offered by Nebraska Senator J.James Exon (DEM.) and testimony from
>several prominent educational and religious groups, the plan directs
>the NSA (National Security Agency) to impliment a comprehensive filtering
>system of the popular Usenet discussion forums available on the Internet.
> Enter LoofBot.
> The LoofBot (Lexical Obscenity On-line Filter) is essentially a
>scripted computer program developed by technical specialists at the NSA.
>It taps into what is known as an NNTP feed, which carries these electronic
>messages between systems, and scans for abusive language.
> When an obscene word (selected from an FCC profanity list) is
>encountered, the LoofBot takes appropriate action. The word is deleted
>and replaced with a non-offensive word, more acceptable to Internet's
>growing adolescent readership.
> "This is not censorship." insists Exon. "The LoofBot doesn't distort
>the meaning of a message. Only those smutty words. We're just trying to
>bring electronic communications in line with laws covering television
>broadcasting. We view these edits as the cyberspace equivilant of bleeps,
>like when that Madonna singer was on David Lettermen."
> NSA spokesman, Nathan Fromage, anticipates that determined users
>will attempt to thwart the program, "probably by switching cases, leaving
>extra spaces or asterisks between the letters of an obscene word."
>A state-of-the-art fuzzy-logic module has be incorporated into the
>algorhythm to prevent this type of evasion.
> Indeed, Fromage suspects that the cyber-community, long known for it's
>technical jargon, will ultimately develop it's own new list of profanities,
>either by using foreign curse words or creating them ex nihilo.
> By then, of course, he'll be ready with LoofBot II.
Yeah, I heard that <BLINK>ing rumor too. Don't believe it! It's a
crock of <DOO-DOO>. The guy who wrote that has his head up his
<FANNY>. Have you *ever* seen a journalist who knew UseNet from a
Tennis Net?
How the <HECK> do they plan to do it? They'd have to swift through
every <BLINK>ing message in UseNet, parse out the profanity, insert
inoffensive language, and then repost it. Even if they *could*, there's gotta
be a million ways to <BLINK> it up.
If those <GOSH-DANG> pinheads think they can dictate my language,
they can just kiss my <TUSH>!!
> and write your Senator while you're at it. (I hope you ninnies out
> there who voted republican are happy with yourselves!)
BTW, Exon is a *Democrat*, you <TUSH>hole!!
Dave Furstenau df@unlinfo.unl.edu
-------------------------------
Approved by: LOOFBOT (04/01/95)
-------------------------------
 |
Home
The Net
Comics
Links
Stories
Buy Stuff